Living a Life “Without Wax”

Philippians 1:10: “…so that you may approve the things that are excellent, in order to be sincere and blameless until the day of Christ” (NASB).

In the Greek language, the word translated “approve” referred to assaying metals or testing money for its authenticity. Having knowledge and using discernment enable the believer to distinguish between the pure and the impure, the valuable and the worthless, the authentic and the counterfeit. When mining for precious metals the valuable metals are intertwined with rock and sediment that is often of no value, and it is necessary to separate the two in order to eliminate impurities and isolate the valuable metal. Likewise, we live in a world in which we are surrounded by and bombarded with impurities and worthless dross. We are called to approve only those things that are excellent–true, and God-honoring.

The word “sincere” in this verse, when understood in its original context and meaning, provides what I find to be one of the most fascinating word pictures in Paul’s writings. In Greek the word translated here as “sincere” means genuine, and in Latin it means pure or clean. There are many historical accounts of the prevalence of this word among pottery makers in the Roman empire. Pottery making was a lucrative business. After all, there was no plastic, and thus no Tupperware or Ziploc bags. Many of the storage containers we take for granted today did not exist, and pottery was used for the majority of storage. As with any business that proves to be lucrative, many people wanted to get in on the pottery business, and whenever there is competition there is usually a price war, too, as sellers try to beat their competition.

Pottery, of course, is shaped and then cured in an oven. Well-respected and high-quality potters would inspect their pottery after it cured for any cracks in the pottery. Items with cracks would be discarded, and the potter would start over. Of course, this meant that the price of his pottery was higher, because it was a more time consuming process to ensure that only quality pots were produced. Less honorable potters, however, would fill the cracks in their pots with hot wax, and then glaze or paint the pot, thus concealing the filling. This enabled them to sell their pots at cheaper prices, because damaged or imperfect pottery was not discarded.

Since finished pots looked the same to the naked eye whether they had filled cracks or no cracks at all, it became important to test the quality of the pottery. The way to identify if the pottery has wax-filled cracks was to hold the pottery up to the sunlight. If wax had been used to fill cracks, the bright light of the sun would reveal the filled cracks. As this practice grew, makers of fine pottery would mark their pottery sine cera, or hang a sign over the doors of their shops that said sincerus. This were indicators that the pottery was genuine…without wax.

So, what about the application? Just as the pottery had to be held to the light of the sun to reveal any imperfections, we must regularly hold ourselves up to the light of the Son. When we do so, we will discover our imperfections. The question is, when we find those imperfections, what do we do with them? Do we fill them with wax and cover them up, putting on an attractive outer covering? Sadly, many of us have mastered the art of concealing our imperfections. We look great on the outside, we do what we are supposed to do, say what we are supposed to say… Jesus had very harsh words for people like that…people who look great on the outside but are hiding sinful attitudes and imperfections on the inside. If we want to be sincere–if we want to be genuine and without wax–we must, like the honest potters, refuse to cover up our imperfections and instead do what is necessary to be genuine. Obviously we cannot “discard our pot” to the extent of throwing our lives away literally, but we can discard our “self” and allow the Master Potter to remake us. When we live for self and try to do things our way we are filling our cracks with wax. When we die to self and let Christ take over, then we can be marked sine cera.

Don’t be Stupid

Philippians 1:9-10 reads, “And it is my prayer that your love may abound more and more, with knowledge and all discernment, so that you may approve what is excellent, and so be pure and blameless for the day of Christ” (ESV).

I think there are several important messages to be taken from this exhortation from Paul to the church at Philippi. First, notice that Paul is not reprimanding or chastising his readers for any areas of weakness as he does in some of his other letters. Still, he writes that their love should abound more and more, which is evidence to me that as believers we never “make it.” We can never reach a point where we can say, “I have completed the course. I have mastered the Christian life. There is nothing more for me to learn.” On the contrary, there is always room for improvement, for growth, for “more and more.”

Second, Paul instructs his readers that their love should grow “with knowledge” (ESV) or “in knowledge” (NKJV). Love for God is something that grows out of our knowledge of Him. We grow in knowledge of Him in the same way that we grow in knowledge of any person with whom we may have a relationship–by spending time with Him. We need to read His word, to spend time in prayer, to attend church and spend time with other believers.

Third, our knowledge of God should influence our actions. Paul follows “knowledge” with “all discernment.” Having head knowledge is not enough; we must know how to use that knowledge and apply it in our lives in order to live it out. There are many people who have an extensive knowledge of the Bible in a historical or academic sense, but have no idea what it is really about–or, more accurately Who it is really about–and how the Bible should influence their lives. Knowledge is really only beneficial when it is accompanied by discernment, which is the wisdom to apply the knowledge.

When I was in college my sister Marianne, who is twelve years younger than me, asked me once what the difference is between ignorant and stupid. I thought for a minute before responding, then told her that ignorant is lacking intelligence, while stupid is refusing to use the intelligence that you have. So, using that definition, Paul is telling the church at Philippi, and by extension is telling you and me, “Don’t be stupid!” We must not refuse to use the intelligence–the knowledge–that we have.

Looking Back (part 5)

Here we are, finally…a look at the books I read in 2011. Then I can get back to blogging about other things, most of which will probably prove more interesting than a reflection on my reading habits over the past five years!

The first book I read in 2011 was Sarah Palin’s second offering, America By Heart. Combining accounts of her travels around the country to visit with voters and deeper examinations of her convictions and policy commitments, I found it a good book. It would be particularly helpful if Palin ever decides to run for public office again, but even if she does not it will be appreciated by any who want to know more about Palin in her own words, as well as anyone who enjoys the political scene. I also read George W. Bush’s memoir, Decision Points. In fact, I read several memoirs of Bush Administration officials during 2011, as I will highlight shortly, which proved to be particularly interesting since not having long gaps between reading them makes it easier to identify slight discrepancies or matters of opinion in recollections of certain events, and helps put various pieces together into full pictures. I enjoyed Bush’s book. It provides a nice survey of his years before the White House, and is honest about his academic struggles, struggles with alcohol, and other things that he would not necessarily have had to address. Later in the year I read Tim Pawlenty’s Courage to Stand. At the time, Pawlenty was a likely candidate for the GOP nomination in the 2012 presidential race–a position he later formally announced–but he did not last long in the race, choosing to drop out after the Iowa Straw Poll. I won’t use this space to discuss that in much detail other than to say that to drop out after the Iowa Straw Poll is a clear indication to me of someone who is not really committed to running for President or ready for what the race will entail. (And as a side note, his hasty departure was disappointing to me, but I would prefer someone who is not committed to what it will take to drop out sooner than later, so in that sense it was good). I later read Herman Cain’s This is Herman Cain!, a short book that did not really do much to increase my interest in Cain as a serious candidate for the nomination, but a helpful read for anyone interested in knowing more about his background and policy ideas. It was ambitiously subtitled “My Journey to the White House,” a journey that has since, of course, come to a premature end. Dick Cheney’s In My Time is a thorough look at Cheney’s entire career in Washington, which is much more extensive than his eight years as Vice President. Reading it will likely dispel any suggestions made by many that Cheney was not qualified to be VP, but will not likely change any opinions about his churlishness. Meghan McCain’s Dirty Sexy Politics is a very unique look at the 2008 presidential race from the perspective of the adult daughter of John McCain who was on the campaign trail, but marginalized by the campaign. She is not shy about the fact that she does not fit many of the stereotypes of a Republican, and she unashamedly embraces positions that many, including her father, do not. Parts of the book are unnecessary and immature, but for political junkies it is an interesting read. Finally, Condoleezza Rice’s No Higher Honor rounds out my Bush-era memoir selections. It is a good book, extremely literate and detailed, and is the longest of the three by a substantial margin. As I mentioned, it is very interesting to see some of the differences between Bush, Cheney and Rice. Rice has high regard and respect for George Bush; she often clashed, however, with Donald Rumsfeld and not infrequently with Dick Cheney.

My first book in 2011 in the area of spiritual development and Christian living was Brother Andrew’s The Practice of the Presence of God. It is an excellent look at what it means to take joy in serving God regardless of how insignificant the service may seem from a human standpoint. J.I. Packer and Carolyn Nystrom’s Lead Us, Guide Us is an excellent book on seeking, identifying and following the will of God. Phillip Keller’s Lessons From a Sheep Dog is a short and easy to read book that provides some insights into the Christian life through lessons Keller learned from his sheep dog. Andy Stanley’s The Best Question Ever is another good book about following the Lord. John Piper’s The Passion of Jesus Christ is an excellent look at that subject, and Erwin Lutzer’s One Minute After You Die is an informative examination of what we can know about Heaven…and Hell. John MacArthur’s Slave examines the usage of that word in Scripture and its implications for what it means to completely follow Christ. Rocking the Roles is Robert Lewis and William Hendricks’ look at the roles in a marriage relationship. Robert Morgan’s The Red Sea Rules is a short book that examines lessons that can be learned from the Israelites encounter at the Red Sea and applied to the Christian life today. Kyle Idleman’s Not a Fan is a good book that examines how many Christians behave toward God like fans rather than committed followers. R.C. Sproul’s commentary John, on that gospel, is a thorough examination of the book that reads more like messages from the text than a verse by verse commentary–which is appropriate, since that is what it is. And Ann Voskamp’s One Thousand Gifts is a thought-provoking book written in a unique style (sometimes like a stream of consciousness) that reminds the reader of the importance of giving thanks to God, and looking for reasons to give thanks–and the impact that living that way will have on one’s attitude and interaction with others as well as with the Lord.

I also read a considerable amount about education in general and Christian in particular during 2011. Neila Connors’ If You Don’t Feed the Teachers They Eat the Students is an easy to read book that reminds education leaders about the importance of providing encouragement, feedback and social interaction opportunities for teachers. James Deuink edited A Fresh Look at Christian Education, which provides essays on a variety of school-related topics from faculty members of Bob Jones University, and he also edited Preparing the Christian School for the 21st Century. Ardell Jacquot’s Guide to Successful Christian Teaching is full of practical advice for the Christian school teacher. Howard Hendricks’ Teaching to Change Lives is beneficial reading for any person who teaches, at any level or in any setting. Charles Walker and his son Brian provided an updated look at John Milton Gregory in their book A 21st Century Perspective of the Seven Laws of Teaching. E.D. Hirsch, Jr.’s Cultural Literacy is a further examination of that subject, including curriculum suggestions. Douglas Wilson’s The Case for Classical Christian Education does a good job of laying out exactly that, and his Repairing the Ruins provides further examination of the subject. Richard Whitmire’s The Bee Eater examines Michelle Rhee’s efforts as chancellor at reforming the public school system in the District of Columbia. Dayton Hobbs’ Classroom Discipline From A to Z is a practical guide for classroom teachers. Susan Wise Bauer and Jessie Wise provide an outstanding examination of the benefits of classical education in The Well-Trained Mind and explain how parents can provide a classical homeschool education. Leigh Bortins, founder of Classical Conversations, also expounds on the benefits of the classical model in The Core. Glen Schultz provides a strong case for the need for Christian education in Kingdom Education and outlines what it should look like. Frankly, I found it much more informative and worthwhile than ACSI President Brian Simmons’ Worth It, which is supposed to justify the cost of Christian education. Gordon Brown’s Guiding Faculty to Excellence is a good book and a valuable resource for Christian education leaders, and Kenneth Gangel’s Team Leadership in Christian Ministry will be valuable reading for leaders in any Christian ministry. D. Bruce Lockerbie’s A Christian Paideia is a collection of speeches and articles Lockerbie has presented, but it provides one of the strongest cases of the need for Christian education and what it should, and should not, include that I have seen.

In the area of history… James Swanson’s Bloody Crimes continues his examination of events following the Lincoln assassination, and in this case looks specifically at the retreat of Jefferson Davis through the South. An excellent book. Nicholas Best wrote an interesting look at the final days of World War I in The Greatest Day in History, and understanding the events covered in this book goes a long way to understanding how not too long thereafter the world found itself in the midst of World War II. Laura Hillenbrand’s Unbroken is an amazing story of the life of Louis Zamperini. Parts of the book, quite honestly, are hard to read, and if it were a fictional story there are times when one would easily accuse the author of piling on unnecessarily, stretching the string of things one person must endure to unbelievable extremes. The fact that it is a true story makes it absolutely incredible, and the power of the Gospel that is seen throughout the story is also terrific. Eric Metaxas’ Bonhoeffer is a very thorough examination of the life of the German theologian and his efforts to defeat (even to kill) Adolph Hitler. Basil Miller’s George Muller: Man of Faith and Miracles is a short and easy to read look at the incredible life and ministry of Muller. Walter Borneman’s 1812 is an interesting look at the War of 1812, and Joseph Ellis’s First Family is a very readable and fascinating look at the Adams Family, but John and Abigail in particular. Ron Chernow’s Washington is a massive biography of our first president, but very well done and incredibly interesting. It draws substantially on Washington’s own letters and journals. David Hackett Fischer wrote a wonderful biography of the explorer Samuel de Champlain in Champlain’s Dream, a book that, because of Champlain’s involvement of so much of French history in the new world for so long, also provides an insightful look at that subject. Candice Millard wrote a fascinating book in The Destiny of the Republic, one that’s primary focus is the assassination of James Garfield, but that examines the life of the assassin and the scientific developments of the era in general and the work of Alexander Graham Bell in particular, in the process.

My fiction reading again included works by John Grisham, David Baldacci, James Patterson and Jeffrey Archer. It also included The Sonderberg Case by Elie Wiesel, and the classics Mutiny on the Bounty by Nordhall and Hall; Pygmalion and Candida by George Bernard Shaw; To the Lighthouse by Virginia Woolf; The Brothers Karamazov by Fyodor Dostoevsky; and Great Expectations by Charles Dickens. I will not go into any detail other than to say that I am completely at a loss as to why Woolf’s book is considered one of the greatest of the 20th century and Dostoevsky’s one of the greatest, if not the greatest, novel ever written. They certainly did not have that impact on me.

One interesting autobiography that doesn’t really fit into any of the categories above is Dick Van Dyke’s My Lucky Life in and Out of Show Business. It is interesting for its content about his personal life and his involvement in show biz, but there is a part of the book that has really stuck with me that concerned his experience in church. van Dyke discusses attending church growing up, reading the Bible and even many deep-thinking theologians, serving as a Sunday school teacher and an elder in the Presbyterian church. However, when Van Dyke and another elder suggested during the Civil Rights movement that their church partner with an African American church in town to facilitate better understanding and relationship building, and to include each attending a service at the other church, other elders said in no uncertain terms that blacks had never been in their church and never would be in their church. When this attitude was not confronted and defeated, Van Dyke left the church and has never been back. A convicting reminder that it can take the stupidity and bigotry of only one person to destroy the testimony of Christ.

So, there we are…a look back at five years of reading. It seems pretty clear to me that my reading is defintiely confined, for the most part, to history and politics, Christian living and spiritual development, leadership and education, baseball and fiction that usually is along the lines of mystery, intrigue and crime. I don’t really foresee that pattern changing anytime soon, but who knows…. I always have a long list of books waiting to be read, and I often have two or three going at a time. But I am also always looking for good books…so if you have a suggestion, let me know!

Looking Back (part 4)

And now it is time to look back at 2010…

My reading included a variety, as usual. With 2010 being an election year I was–as I always am during election years–thinking a lot about politics, so my reading at the beginning of the year included a couple of books about politics and, specifically, campaigning: The Political Campaign Desk Reference by Michael McNamara and Campaign Bootcamp by Christine Pelosi, daughter of then-Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi. I found both very interesting reading, but I would not recommend them for anyone not considering running for office him- or herself or seriously interested in the cost (financial and otherwise) of running for office in the United States.

A variety of spiritual development and Christian living book populate my 2010 reading list, including Spiritual Leadership by J. Oswald Sanders, a classic on the subject; Being Christian by Stephen Arterburn and John Shore, a good book for new Christians especially; Crazy Love by Francis Chan; Fearless and Outlive Your Life by Max Lucado; Experiencing the Resurrection by Henry and Mel Blackaby; A Tale of Two Sons by John MacArthur; Kevin Lehman and Bill Pentak’s short book The Way of the Shepherd; How Should I Live in This World? by R.C. Sproul; Dual Citizens by Jason Stellman; and Christian Atheist by Craig Groeschel. I also read Alex and Brett Harris’s book targeted at young people, Do Hard Things.

In the Name of Jesus by Henri Nouwen is a short but powerful book about what it means to be a leader in accordance with biblical principles, drawing on both Satan’s tempting of Jesus in the wilderness and Nouwen’s own experiences at L’Arche. C.J. Mahaney’s short book Humility: True Greatness is also powerful, and convicting. Joe Stowell’s Jesus Nation is an excellent book highlighting how believers’ lives should be impacted by, and evidently show, their relationship with Christ. John Ortberg’s The Me I Want to Be is perhaps the best book in this category that I read in 2010, though, and is probably the book that I have given to more people than any other book I have read in recent years. In his trademark style Ortberg articulates what living the Christian life should look like…and why it is harder than it “looks.” One friend to whom I gave the book commented later that it might have been more accurately titled “The Me I Should Want to Be.” It goes very well with the aforementioned Stowell book, too, and perhaps even better with another Stowell book I read in 2010, Why It’s Hard to Love Jesus. And Chip Ingram’s Holy Ambition is an excellent examination of what it means to seek and follow God’s plan for your life regardless of cost or other human obstacle.

There was a large number of fiction books again, including titles by James Patterson, David Baldacci and John Grisham, including his first offering in the genre of youth fiction. I also read Michael Crichton’s last book Pirate Latitudes, an interesting entry into what was at the time a very popular subject area, and one that, to me, is far more enjoyable than the various Disney movies that seem to have sparked the recent increase in books and movies around that time period. I decided to branch out and read several new or new-to-me authors in the field of contemporary fiction. Mark Mills’ The Information Officer, a fictional look at a very specific niche of World War II, with a British officer attempting to influence the news on Malta, was an interesting read. Another new author for me was Elizabeth Lowell, and her Blue Smoke and Murder weaves a tale that includes the art world and ruthless intrigue, putting together (of course) a male and female team that eventually overcomes all of the obstacles to their success. In some ways it reminded me of some of Baldacci’s work. Eric Van Lustbader’s First Daughter is about an ATF agent who lost his own daughter, and must now lead the search for the kidnapped daughter of the President-elect, who was his own daughter’s best friend. Elizabeth George’s Careless in Red was my first exposure to her famed Inspector Linley. Joseph Finder’s Vanished is another in the sometimes-predictable field of individual agents overcoming insane odds to defeat vast conspiracies in the defense of a loved one (akin to the Jason Bourne movies). Jeffrey Archer’s And Thereby Hangs a Tale is a nice collection of short stories that I found very enjoyable. And my classic fiction reading for 2010 included Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451, George Orwell’s 1984 and Alexandre Dumas’ The Count of Monte Cristo. The first two were interesting enough, but I highly recommend the third.

History selections included Thomas Fleming’s Washington’s Secret War, a very interesting look at how Washington dealt with behind-the-scenes efforts by some in the Army to remove him as commander of the Continental forces. Nathaniel Philbrick’s Mayflower is a fantastic look at the settling of the colony at Plymouth Rock, the relationship between the Pilgrims and Strangers and the Native Americans in the area in the years shortly after the Europeans’ arrival, but also the relationship between the groups for decades after. James Horn’s A Kingdom Strange is a look at the “Lost Colony” that Sir Walter Raleigh planted on the Outer Banks of North Carolina; Steven Waldman’s Founding Faith is a thorough and careful examination of the religious convictions of the Founding Fathers; and Harlow Giles Unger’s Lion of Liberty is a well done biography of Patrick Henry.

In the area of autobiographies, R. B. Mitchell’s book Castaway Kid is moving account of Mitchell’s years growing up in a children’s home, occasionally visited by his mother, who was not emotionally able to care for him; secretly rejected by his father’s family, though they allowed some visits; an never quite able to understand why he could not live permanently with his grandmother. In college Mitchell would accept Christ and meet his future bride; after graduation he became a very successful businessman. Still Standing is Carrie Prejean’s look at what it was like to be ridiculed for opposing same sex marriage in answering a question in the Miss USA pageant. No Apology is Mitt Romney’s look back at his life and his 2008 presidential bid, and mostly a defense of his positions on various issues. Spoken From the Heart is Laura Bush’s autobiography, a well-written and interesting book.

Dawn Jewell Herzog’s Escaping the Devil’s Bedroom is another book about global sex trafficking and the power of the Gospel, a hard-to-read but still-necessary book along the lines of those by Haugen and Batstone addressed in my reflections on 2009.

Other books included The Only Game in Town, Fay Vincent’s fascinating oral history of baseball stars from the 1930s and 1940s; Jason Turbow and Michael Duca’s The Baseball Codes, a fascinating look at some of the unwritten rules of Major League baseball; Mona Charen’s Do-Gooders, an examination of how many of the programs and policy initiatives of the political left may in fact hurt those they purportedly are designed to help; E.D. Hirsch, Jr’s The Schools We Need is a sharp reproach of the inferior level of education provided in public schools and the importance of cultural literacy; and Lee Cockerell’s Creating Magic examines the “Disney Way,” the secrets of the incredibly strong culture among Disney employees and the high level of customer service and corporate pride at all Disney properties.

One more year to go…then I’ll get back to blogging about things other than my reading habits.

We Interrupt These Messages…

I am interrupting my reflections on my reading over the past five years to take a look at last night’s Iowa Caucuses.

I love presidential politics, so I might be blogging along these lines off and on all year. You certainly aren’t required to agree with me (or even read my thoughts!) but I hope my ramblings will prove thought-provoking and perhaps prompt you to look into the candidates and the issues more deeply yourself…because I can respect a voter who disagrees with me, but have trouble with a voter who is uninformed.

First of all, let me say that I am a fan of the Iowa Caucuses. I have been on both sides of the debate as to whether or not Iowa should get to be the powerful voice that it is in presidential elections, because I think there are legitimate arguments to be made for the “first in the nation” vote to rotate each time so that different states and different voters get to have the influence of that first vote. That aside, whether it is in Iowa or elsewhere, there is something powerful about the personal level of politics required to be successful in Iowa, and I happen to think that the caucus system is more effective for the initial vote than a primary would be, so I have no qualm with that. At the same time, I have to say that voter turnout for the Iowa caucuses tends to be relatively low, and–surprisingly, in my opinion–it was no higher this year than it was 4 years ago, despite the strong opinion among many that real change is needed in America.

Having attended undergraduate school in Des Moines, Iowa, I have some personal experience with the Iowa caucuses, too. To my absolute astonishment, there were precincts in and around Des Moines in 1996 who had no one to be in charge of the caucus meetings. As a result, a number of political science students from Drake University–including me–had the opportunity to get quite involved. I was not a resident of Iowa, so I could not vote, but I was in the position of checking voters registration, leading the caucus meeting, counting the votes and calling in the results. Pretty cool stuff! Even more surprising than the fact that there were some precincts with no one charge, there was one precinct meeting where no one showed up to vote. The precincts in that particular section of Des Moines were small enough, and ideal potential meeting locations rare enough, that two precincts were meeting in the same building. That turned out to be quite fortunate for me and the other student from Drake assigned to the building, since we were both able to be involved despite one having no one in attendance. But the bottom line is, whoever shows up gets one vote…and last night’s results clearly showed that one vote does make a difference, since Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum finished the night separated by only eight votes.

This was a surprise to many people, because Rick Santorum has consistently polled in the single digits, and he has been banished to the far end in every debate thus far. However, Santorum has campaigned consistently and persistently in Iowa, visiting every county in the state (and most of the Pizza Ranches, apparently) holding more than 300 meetings with voters. He does very well with local politics, and he has a clear and consistent message that many voters find appealing.

Still, there are plenty of people already saying Rick Santorum’s showing in yesterday’s Iowa caucuses will have little or no meaning on the rest of the campaign, presenting nothing more than slight bump in the road to Mitt Romney’s inevitable nomination. I have to disagree, and a deeper examination of the results of the Iowa vote reveals why: Quite simply, Santorum has broader support among the GOP candidates than anyone else.

Look at the numbers from the polls:

* Among men, Santorum and Romney each received 23% of the vote, just one percent behind Ron Paul’s 24%;

* Among women, Santorum and Romney each received 26% of the vote, 6% ahead of Ron Paul’s 20%;

* Among Republicans, Santorum received 28% of the vote, 1% more than Romney, and double the next closest candidates (Gingrich and Paul at 14% each);

* Among Conservatives, Santorum received 27% of the vote, 5% more than Romney and 9% more than Paul;

* Among young voters (17-29), Ron Paul was the runaway winner, with 48%, but Santorum was second at 23%, 10% more than Romney, the next-closest candidate;

* Among voters 30-44, Santorum was the winner with 29%, 1% more than Paul but 10% more than Romney;

* Among voters 45-64, Santorum was just 1% behind Romney (26% to 25%) and 8% ahead of Paul;

* Romney was the clear leader among voters 65+ with 32% of the vote, but Santorum was second with 19%, ahead of Gingrich (17%) and Perry (12%) and Paul (11%);

* Santorum was the clear winner among Evangelical voters, with 32% of the vote to Ron Paul’s 19%. Romney and Gingrich each had 14% and Perry 13%;

* Santorum finished third among non-evangelical voters, behind Romney (38%) and Paul (26%), and third among non-Tea Party voters behind Romney (44%) and Paul (21%);

* Santorum clearly won the Tea Party vote, with 28%. Romney and Paul each received 19%;

* Romney narrowly edged Santorum among college-educated voters (26% to 25%), but Santorum narrowly edged Romney among those without a college degree (23% to 22%).

Santorum’s only areas of huge weakness in Iowa were Independent voters, who went overwhelmingly with Ron Paul, and moderate voters, who gave a combined 74% of their vote to Paul and Romney. Among Independents, though, Santorum received 13% to Romney’s 18%. And Santorum did not finish lower than third in ANY category of voters. He finished third in four categories…but Romney finished third in three. Ron Paul’s lowest finish was fifth, among voters 65+.

So what can we take from this as we look ahead? First, Santorum is unlikely to perform as well in New Hampshire as he did in Iowa. New Hampshire is an area where Romney enjoys considerable support…support that will only be enhanced by John McCain endorsement of Romney there today. McCain has long been a New Hampshire favorite. However, along with Michele Bachmann announcing the end of her candidacy today and Rick Perry expected to do the same, McCain’s endorsement of Romney is actually likely to benefit Santorum. Many Republican voters, and particularly those who were drawn to Bachmann and Perry, voted against Barack Obama more than they voted for John McCain, and they tend to look at Mitt Romney the same way: he is better than Obama, but if there is another option they are likely to go that route. And right now, there are other options. Ron Paul will continue to generate his share of votes, because he appeals to a unique niche of voters and has a very unique message, but he will not be the Republican nominee, and will be unlikely to pick up much support from from the exit of Bachmann and Perry. New Hampshire is Jon Huntsman’s one chance at a decent showing, but it will end there for him. If he doesn’t finish second to Romney it will be a loss, and even if he does finish second, it won’t likely generate any additional success thereafter. Huntsman is the epitome of what many call a RINO, a Republican in Name Only, on many issues, and he simply isn’t going to find broad support. Gingrich has a chance to try to redeem himself in New Hampshire, but he seems more likely to devote his attention to defeating Romney than actually winning himself. And that, too, will only help Santorum.

Looking past New Hampshire, Santorum is likely to perform much better in South Carolina. There is a large number of voters in South Carolina among the constituencies in which Santorum scored well in Iowa, and if he can manage to pull off a finish in the top three in New Hampshire he will be in great shape heading south. Even a top-four finish is unlikely to hurt him.

This is crunch time for Santorum, though…especially at the two debates this weekend. Santorum will no longer be on the sidelines of the debate, and he will have to get more time and attention from the moderators. Gingrich isn’t going to attack him, and Ron Paul and Jon Huntsman will likely continue to direct their more aggressive attacks on Mitt Romney. (Paul already minimized Santorum in his speech to supporters last night, saying he does not have the funds for a national campaign). Santorum needs to stick to his message–repeating the themes of his speech last night–and stay true to his positions. He does have some things in his background that he will need to explain, most notably his past endorsement of Arlen Specter, but he is now primed to be the most likely candidate to emerge as an option to Mitt Romney for any GOP voters who aren’t considering Ron Paul’s candidacy a serious option.

As Santorum said last night, “Game on.”

Looking Back (Part 3)

In 2009 I was still working on UNTO THE LORD, as is reflected in my reading of the following titles: Patrick Lencioni’s The Five Dysfunctions of a Team, The Four Obsessions of an Extraordinary Executive, The Three Signs of a Miserable Job, and Death by Meeting, John Maxwell’s The 17 Essential Qualities of a Team Player, Jon Gordon’s The No Complaining Rule and Training Camp, Matt Williams’ How to Be a Team Player…and Enjoy It!, and Quint Studer’s Hardwiring Excellence. There are valuable insights in each of these books. I took much from Studer’s, proving, among other things, that leadership principles are transcendent, since Studer is a hospital executive. But if I had to recommend just one of these books it would definitely be Lencioni’s The Five Dysfunctions of a Team. Lencioni does not write from a biblical perspective, and I do not know that he is a believer, but the key points of this book are biblical, and the principles of the book are essential understanding for any effective team.

By way of spiritual growth and Christian living, Chuck Swindoll’s Improving Your Serve is a good book for an attitude check and the reminder that Christians are to lead by serving; Jack Eggar’s The Return of a Mighty Church provides a succinct examination of some of the things the modern church needs to remember in order to effectively reach the lost; Janet Paschal’s Treasures of the Snow is a personal and poignant look at the strength and comfort that God can provide during a time of very personal struggle–in this case breast cancer; Ravi Zacharias edited an excellent book of thought-provoking essays entitled Beyond Opinion; Jonathan Falwell’s One Great Truth is a satisfactory examination of the practical implications of Paul’s statement “Not I, but Christ;” Joe Stowell’s Perilous Pursuits is a good reminder to pursue those things that really matter…not the temporary things that the world says are important; Erwin Lutzer’s The Vanishing Power of Death is a short but powerful examination of why death is not scary for the Christian (my grandmother gave me this book, and it had special meaning to me when she went home to be with the Lord the following year); and Max Lucado’s Just Like Jesus is a poignant but easy-to-read in Lucado style tome. The most convicting book I read though, and one I highly recommend, was Jerry Bridges’ Respectable Sins.

I read a variety of history in 2009, too, including Gordon Wood’s Revolutionary Characters, which looks at some of the more influential characters of the American Revolutionary War era; Freeman Cleeves’ biography of our ninth president, Old Tippecanoe; Joseph Ellis’ American Creation and Bernard Bailyn’s To Begin the World Anew, both about the founding era; Buddy Levy’s biography of Davy Crockett, American Legend; and, fast forwarding to World War II, Jennet Connant’s The Irregulars, a look at the British spy ring in Washington, D.C. that included Roald Dahl and Ian Fleming.

For more contemporary political history I also read Valerie Plame’s autobiographical Fair Game; Barack Obama’s The Audacity of Hope; Mike Huckabee’s Do the Right Thing; Lorenzo Benet’s biography of Sarah Palin, Trailblazer; and Palin’s autobiography, Going Rogue.

Fiction selections included these contemporary offerings: Jeffrey Archer’s False Impression; David Baldacci’s Divine Justice, Simple Genius, The Collectors and First Family; John Grisham’s The Associate and Ford County; James Patterson’s Cross, Double Cross, Run For Your Life and Step on a Crack; Brad Meltzer’s The Tenth Justice; and Alison Hoover Bartlett’s The Man Who Loved Books Too Much. Classic fiction included Washington Irving’s The Legend of Sleepy Hollow and Other Stories; William Faulkner’s The Sound and the Fury; Arthur Conan Doyle’s The Return of Sherlock Holmes; and F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby. I also read William Young’s The Shack in 2009, and I have to say I am still undecided as to whether I liked it or not. I agree with some of the points Young made, consider others with skepticism at best or disagreement at worst. However, a comprehensive review of the book is not called for here.

Two books that I read in 2009 that were hard to read because of their subject matter were Gary Haugen’s Just Courage and David Batstone’s Not for Sale. Batstone’s is particularly hard to read. The subject matter of these books is the slavery of people around the world, often overlooked or ignored, that is in reality still incredibly–and disturbingly–prevalent. The content of the books is disturbing but necessary, and I am thrilled that the books have prompted some individuals and groups to take definite action in combating forced labor and sexual slavery.

Elizabeth Edwards’ Resilience is a short but profound and thought-provoking book. I did not agree with Edwards on many political issues, but the way in which she handled herself in light of her own breast cancer and her husband’s infidelity is admirable. Marlee Matlin’s I’ll Scream Later is at times disturbing, at times disappointing, but overall a unique look at the life of America’s most successful deaf actress. And Jodee Blanco’s Please Stop Laughing at Me is a book far too many young people today could identify with, and provides excellent evidence of the kind of bullying that until recently received far too little attention.

And, lest you think I skipped any sports books in 2009, I did read Dave Winfield’s Dropping the Ball.

I hope I’m not boring you, but like I said, this is more personal reflection than anything else, and I am enjoying this look back at my reading habits. It is fun to see what I was reading and when, and to remember the details of the various books. Sometimes I can even remember where I was or specific things that were going on when I read some of them, or conversations that I had with certain people about some of the books while I was reading them. Fortunately, I have not yet come across a title and found myself thinking, “I don’t remember that book at all… Did I really read that?”

Two more years to go….

Looking Back (part 2)

Moving on to 2008… In July of 2008 I experienced an issue with my health that would put my mostly out of commission for several weeks, and resulted in me going for nearly a month without completing a book as I literally did very little of anything. (Thank goodness the first season of Matlock had just come out on DVD; I watched lots of Matlock during those weeks!) Still, I managed to finish the year having completed exactly 50 books.

There are, again, a number of books that reflect my work with young people, including Kevin Lehman’s Have a New Kid by Friday, and two that reflect my interest at the time in exploring the messages our culture sends to young people through media: Alissa Quart’s Branded and S. Lamb and L.M. Brown’s Packaging Girlhood.

A large number of the books I read in 2008 though were related to my study of what it means to be a Christian in the workplace–to reflect Christ in day to day activities at work regardless of position. This study ultimately led to the development of UNTO THE LORD: The Roles and Responsibilities of the Christian Worker. Thus far it is only a multi-session training curriculum that has received very positive reviews from those who have participated, but I hope it will someday be a book, too. But the books I read in my study included John Marchica’s The Accountable Organization, Bruce Katcher’s 30 Reasons Employees Hate Their Managers, R.T. Kendall’s Controlling the Tongue, John Trent’s The 2 Degree Difference, Chip Ingram’s Good to Great in God’s Eyes, Beth Moore’s When Godly People Do Ungodly Things, John Townsend’s Whose Pushing Your Buttons?, John Maxwell’s The 360° Leader, Dan Allender’s Leading With a Limp, Ken Sande’s The Peace Maker, Lou Priolo’s Pleasing People, and John Ortberg’s Everybody’s Normal Till You Get to Know Them. There are valuable lessons and insights in each of these books and I would likely recommend any one of them at one time or another to different people and in different situations. If I had to select just one to recommend from this list, though, Allender’s book is a great exploration of what true leadership is…and isn’t, and that would be the standout of the bunch.

I also read Marcus Buckingham’s trilogy of books on identifying and implementing strengths in the workplace, First, Break All the Rules (with C. Coffman), Now, Discover Your Strengths (with D. Clifton) and Go Put Your Strengths to Work. All three were valuable, and include lessons applicable outside of the workplace, as well–to Christian ministry, for example, even volunteer ministry positions within the church.

Spiritual development and Christian living books in 2008 included Shaunti and Jeff Feldhahn’s For Men Only (an excellent book for men wanting a better understanding of their wives in general and how a woman’s mind works differently than a man’s in particular), Surrender by Nancy Leigh DeMoss (a small but powerful book), The Holy Wild by Mark Buchanan (who has become a favorite contemporary Christian writer and an excellent expositor of thought-provoking reflections on applying Scripture), Desiring God by John Piper (if you are familiar with John Piper at all you have likely at least heard of this book; and if you want to understand the concept of “Christian hedonism” on which the majority of Piper’s ministry has been based this is a must-read), God is Good by Tony Beckett (another easy to read book with very relevant insights) and The Grand Weaver by Ravi Zacharias (in my mind, you cannot go wrong with anything written by Zacharias). I also read Buchanan’s Hidden in Plain Sight, a powerful examination of 2 Peter 2:1-9 in which Buchanan identifies and explores the virtues that should be evident in the Christian life. I end with this book for this section because it is the one I would recommend, if I had to pick just one, from the books mentioned in this paragraph.

There was some fiction in 2008, too, including the classic children’s favorite Stuart Little by E.B. White, the Christian classic Pilgrim’s Progress by John Bunyan, and Edith Wharton’s The Age of Innocence, the 1921 Pulitzer Prize winner for Literature. More contemporary fiction offerings included David Baldacci’s The Camel Club, the introduction to his recurring set of characters by the same name, and John Grisham’s The Appeal. In fact, I read a good bit of both Baldacci and Grisham in 2008, with Baldacci’s Stone Cold and The Whole Truth and Grisham’s Bleachers and Playing for Pizza rounding out the list. Baldacci’s books would be great for anyone who enjoys conspiracy theories, in particular. Bleachers is Grisham’s short book about adult males returning to their hometown after the death of their high school football coach, and Playing for Pizza is a look at an NFL quarterback whose career is in the dumps who decides to head for Italy to play in a new Italian football league. Were this book made into a movie, and the pre-marital sexual activity left out (though it is not portrayed graphically in the book) it would be an almost-perfect combination of sports movie and chick-flick. I also read Randy Alcorn’s Safely Home. While this is a work of fiction, it is a powerful book examining the persecution of Christians in China.

As for 2008’s non-fiction selections, I read James Swanson’s Manhunt, an outstanding book on the weeks following the assassination of Abraham Lincoln, the escape route of John Wilkes Booth, and the ensuing hunt to find Booth and his accomplices. The book was particularly meaningful for me since I grew up in Southern Maryland right where many of the events take place, but I highly recommend the book to anyone interested in that era of American history. Angus Konstam’s Blackbeard is an admirable biography of that most-famous of American pirates for anyone interested in that sliver of history. Kenneth Walsh’s Feeding the Beast is a decent look at the way media, particularly in this age of 24/7 news, relates to politics, and Donald Cole’s Martin Van Buren and the American Political System is a good biography of the Little Magician from Kinderhook. Bernard Ruffin’s Fanny Crosby is an excellent biography of the prolific hymn writer, and Tony Dungy’s Quiet Strength is a good book for anyone, whether football fan or not.

Tomorrow I’ll provide an overview of the 64 books I read in 2009….

Looking Back (part 1)

As one year ends and another is about to begin it is a time that naturally lends itself to looking back…reflecting on the past. Usually that reflection involves looking back at the previous year, and I could certainly go on for quite some time in reflecting on the past twelve months because it has been a 12 months unlike any other 12 month period in my life. And I just may do that over the next few days. Today, though, I want to reflect back over the past five years, because the end of 2011 marks the end of five years since I decided to start keeping a record of the books I read.

I have enjoyed reading for as long as I can remember, and I have always read a lot. In January 2007, though, I decided to start recording the titles of each book I read and the date on which I finished the book. I think partly it was out of curiosity. Partly it was a challenge to myself–I wanted to see how many books I read, since I really had no idea, and I arbitrarily picked a goal of 50 books for the year. It may have had something to do with the fact that I turned 30 in 2007, too, though I cannot now think of any specific correlation between turning 30 and wanting to record my reading habits. Whatever the reason(s), I did begin such a record, and I have been keeping track ever since. And now, five years into it, it seems like a good time to look back at what I have read…to see what it tells me about me, if nothing else.

First of all, I did meet my goal of 50 books in 2007. Exceeded it, in fact. And I have met or exceeded that goal in each of the five years, reading a total of 311 books over that span. (Not counting all the books I have read to my children during that time!) The smallest figure over those five years was 50, in 2008…and I finished the 50th book on December 31! The largest number was 78 (this year). This may impress some of you, especially if you don’t read much. To average more than one completed book per week over five years probably seems remarkable. To others, it may seem but a modest accomplishment, as you may read far more than that. It seemed rather insignificant when I read in George W. Bush’s book Decision Points (finished that one in January 2011) that he read more than 100 books per year. After all, I’d like to think I have more time to read than the President of the United States does!

It has been said that you can identify a person’s priorities by looking at two things: their checkbook and their calendar. I agree. I would also suggest, however, that you can learn a lot about someone by looking at the books they read. So, I’m about to do some self-examination…and I guess you get to look on while I do.

Let’s start with 2007. I was still the Executive Director of a children’s home then, and that is reflected somewhat by my reading for the year in books like David Popenoe’s Life Without Father, and Lawrence Diller’s The Last Normal Child, John Townsend’s Boundaries with Teens, and Koren Zailckas’s Smashed. Popenoe leaves the reader with no doubt that children are adversely impacted by a life without a father, despite the argument many have tried to make to the contrary. Diller talks about the dangerous overuse of prescription drugs on children in America in a book of essays that continue where his previous book, Running on Ritalin, left off. Townsend, of the well-known pair of John Townsend and Henry Cloud, takes a look at the application of the “Boundaries” philosophy for which the pair is so well known as it applies to teenagers. And Zailckas provides a disturbingly graphic and simultaneously heart wrenching account of being a teenage alcoholic…and her parents never having a clue.

2007 also includes a good number of books on personal spiritual growth and Christian living, including Henry & David Blackaby’s Called to Be God’s Leader, Max Lucado’s Facing Your Giants, John MacArthur’s Lord, Teach Me to Pray, Adrian Rogers’ The Incredible Power of Kingdom Authority, David Jeremiah’s Captured by Grace, John Ortberg’s When the Game is Over, It All Goes Back in the Box, Chip Ingram’s God As He Longs for You to See Him, Mark Buchanan’s Your God is Too Safe and James MacDonald’s Lord Change My Attitude. I think most folks would benefit from reading any of these books, but if you have to pick just one, MacDonald’s book is convicting, relevant, and applicable to any person, anywhere, in any stage of life. I strongly recommend it.

My interest in politics and baseball is also reflected in 2007’s reading. Sean Hannity’s Deliver Us From Evil, Newt Gingrich’s To Renew America, J.C. Watts’ What Color is a Conservative, Major Garrett and Tim Penny’s The Fifteen Biggest Lies in Politics, David Frum’s Dead Right, Tommy Thompson’s Power to the People, and Katherine Harris’s Center of the Storm are all there. I don’t recollect any of these being bad books, but Hannity’s is what you would expect from a right wing radio/TV host. If you like Hannity, Limbaugh, Colter, etc. you’ll enjoy it. If not, don’t bother. Gingrich’s book should be read by anyone considering voting for him in the current election. Watts’ book was very well written, and Thompson’s provides a nice overview of his tenure as governor of Wisconsin. Garrett and Penny have a nice and relevant book, but it was not as good as their first book, Common Cents. For baseball, Joe Morgan’s Long Balls, No Strikes is a good book for any baseball fan. Cal Ripken, Jr.’s Get in the Game is an application of principles he has learned to the game of life, and Ricky Henderson’s Off Base is what you would expect from a very talented, but also very arrogant, baseball star.

There was a smattering of fiction in 2007, as in later years, both contemporary and “classic.” Michael Crichton’s State of Fear was a very interesting read, and would undoubtedly tick off any die hard environmentalists or climate change supporters, too. I read Beowulf, and didn’t like it. I know many do, and I am sure it has literary value, but it wasn’t my cup of tea. Arthur Conan Doyle’s The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes is much more my style, and I enjoyed the first volume of Holmes and Watson very much. Daniel Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe is also excellent, and absolutely should be on any list of best books.

Other nonfiction… John Grisham’s one and, thus far, only non-fiction contribution, Innocent Man, is well written and an incredible story. David Halberstam’s The Education of a Coach is a good and even interesting book…but I still can’t stand Bill Belichick! Many Ways to Say I Love You is a nice compilation of some of the songs and thoughts of Fred Rogers. Mrs. J.H. Worchester’s brief biography, David Livingstone and Dr. and Mrs. Howard Taylor’s The Spiritual Secret of Hudson Taylor are both good books about those incredible men. John Gray’s Custer’s Last Campaign is a thorough examination of it’s title subject. A good book for those interested in Custer or The Battle of the Little Bighorn, but it would likely exhaust or put to sleep those who are at best mildly interested. Robert Remini’s The Life of Andrew Jackson, though, is a relatively easy read and I would recommend it for anyone wanting to know more about the life of our seventh president.

Well…when I started this I actually intended to look back over the last five years in one entry, but it seems that would be a bit much. Just a brief overview of 2007 has resulted in one of my longest entries yet, and I did not even mention twenty-one of the books I read that year. I’ll knock that down to twenty though by stating that Phil Vischer’s Me, Myself and Bob is a fantastic book. I am not a huge fan of VeggieTales, but this book is an excellent look at the cost of pursuing a dream, the cost of turning too much of your dream over to others once success is achieved, and, ultimately, the cost of seeing that dream ended when your dream and God’s plan are no longer in sync. I recommend it highly to anyone.

Anyway, I guess I’ll have to reflect on 2008-2011 over the next few days…so stay tuned.