Looking Back (part 4)

And now it is time to look back at 2010…

My reading included a variety, as usual. With 2010 being an election year I was–as I always am during election years–thinking a lot about politics, so my reading at the beginning of the year included a couple of books about politics and, specifically, campaigning: The Political Campaign Desk Reference by Michael McNamara and Campaign Bootcamp by Christine Pelosi, daughter of then-Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi. I found both very interesting reading, but I would not recommend them for anyone not considering running for office him- or herself or seriously interested in the cost (financial and otherwise) of running for office in the United States.

A variety of spiritual development and Christian living book populate my 2010 reading list, including Spiritual Leadership by J. Oswald Sanders, a classic on the subject; Being Christian by Stephen Arterburn and John Shore, a good book for new Christians especially; Crazy Love by Francis Chan; Fearless and Outlive Your Life by Max Lucado; Experiencing the Resurrection by Henry and Mel Blackaby; A Tale of Two Sons by John MacArthur; Kevin Lehman and Bill Pentak’s short book The Way of the Shepherd; How Should I Live in This World? by R.C. Sproul; Dual Citizens by Jason Stellman; and Christian Atheist by Craig Groeschel. I also read Alex and Brett Harris’s book targeted at young people, Do Hard Things.

In the Name of Jesus by Henri Nouwen is a short but powerful book about what it means to be a leader in accordance with biblical principles, drawing on both Satan’s tempting of Jesus in the wilderness and Nouwen’s own experiences at L’Arche. C.J. Mahaney’s short book Humility: True Greatness is also powerful, and convicting. Joe Stowell’s Jesus Nation is an excellent book highlighting how believers’ lives should be impacted by, and evidently show, their relationship with Christ. John Ortberg’s The Me I Want to Be is perhaps the best book in this category that I read in 2010, though, and is probably the book that I have given to more people than any other book I have read in recent years. In his trademark style Ortberg articulates what living the Christian life should look like…and why it is harder than it “looks.” One friend to whom I gave the book commented later that it might have been more accurately titled “The Me I Should Want to Be.” It goes very well with the aforementioned Stowell book, too, and perhaps even better with another Stowell book I read in 2010, Why It’s Hard to Love Jesus. And Chip Ingram’s Holy Ambition is an excellent examination of what it means to seek and follow God’s plan for your life regardless of cost or other human obstacle.

There was a large number of fiction books again, including titles by James Patterson, David Baldacci and John Grisham, including his first offering in the genre of youth fiction. I also read Michael Crichton’s last book Pirate Latitudes, an interesting entry into what was at the time a very popular subject area, and one that, to me, is far more enjoyable than the various Disney movies that seem to have sparked the recent increase in books and movies around that time period. I decided to branch out and read several new or new-to-me authors in the field of contemporary fiction. Mark Mills’ The Information Officer, a fictional look at a very specific niche of World War II, with a British officer attempting to influence the news on Malta, was an interesting read. Another new author for me was Elizabeth Lowell, and her Blue Smoke and Murder weaves a tale that includes the art world and ruthless intrigue, putting together (of course) a male and female team that eventually overcomes all of the obstacles to their success. In some ways it reminded me of some of Baldacci’s work. Eric Van Lustbader’s First Daughter is about an ATF agent who lost his own daughter, and must now lead the search for the kidnapped daughter of the President-elect, who was his own daughter’s best friend. Elizabeth George’s Careless in Red was my first exposure to her famed Inspector Linley. Joseph Finder’s Vanished is another in the sometimes-predictable field of individual agents overcoming insane odds to defeat vast conspiracies in the defense of a loved one (akin to the Jason Bourne movies). Jeffrey Archer’s And Thereby Hangs a Tale is a nice collection of short stories that I found very enjoyable. And my classic fiction reading for 2010 included Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451, George Orwell’s 1984 and Alexandre Dumas’ The Count of Monte Cristo. The first two were interesting enough, but I highly recommend the third.

History selections included Thomas Fleming’s Washington’s Secret War, a very interesting look at how Washington dealt with behind-the-scenes efforts by some in the Army to remove him as commander of the Continental forces. Nathaniel Philbrick’s Mayflower is a fantastic look at the settling of the colony at Plymouth Rock, the relationship between the Pilgrims and Strangers and the Native Americans in the area in the years shortly after the Europeans’ arrival, but also the relationship between the groups for decades after. James Horn’s A Kingdom Strange is a look at the “Lost Colony” that Sir Walter Raleigh planted on the Outer Banks of North Carolina; Steven Waldman’s Founding Faith is a thorough and careful examination of the religious convictions of the Founding Fathers; and Harlow Giles Unger’s Lion of Liberty is a well done biography of Patrick Henry.

In the area of autobiographies, R. B. Mitchell’s book Castaway Kid is moving account of Mitchell’s years growing up in a children’s home, occasionally visited by his mother, who was not emotionally able to care for him; secretly rejected by his father’s family, though they allowed some visits; an never quite able to understand why he could not live permanently with his grandmother. In college Mitchell would accept Christ and meet his future bride; after graduation he became a very successful businessman. Still Standing is Carrie Prejean’s look at what it was like to be ridiculed for opposing same sex marriage in answering a question in the Miss USA pageant. No Apology is Mitt Romney’s look back at his life and his 2008 presidential bid, and mostly a defense of his positions on various issues. Spoken From the Heart is Laura Bush’s autobiography, a well-written and interesting book.

Dawn Jewell Herzog’s Escaping the Devil’s Bedroom is another book about global sex trafficking and the power of the Gospel, a hard-to-read but still-necessary book along the lines of those by Haugen and Batstone addressed in my reflections on 2009.

Other books included The Only Game in Town, Fay Vincent’s fascinating oral history of baseball stars from the 1930s and 1940s; Jason Turbow and Michael Duca’s The Baseball Codes, a fascinating look at some of the unwritten rules of Major League baseball; Mona Charen’s Do-Gooders, an examination of how many of the programs and policy initiatives of the political left may in fact hurt those they purportedly are designed to help; E.D. Hirsch, Jr’s The Schools We Need is a sharp reproach of the inferior level of education provided in public schools and the importance of cultural literacy; and Lee Cockerell’s Creating Magic examines the “Disney Way,” the secrets of the incredibly strong culture among Disney employees and the high level of customer service and corporate pride at all Disney properties.

One more year to go…then I’ll get back to blogging about things other than my reading habits.

We Interrupt These Messages…

I am interrupting my reflections on my reading over the past five years to take a look at last night’s Iowa Caucuses.

I love presidential politics, so I might be blogging along these lines off and on all year. You certainly aren’t required to agree with me (or even read my thoughts!) but I hope my ramblings will prove thought-provoking and perhaps prompt you to look into the candidates and the issues more deeply yourself…because I can respect a voter who disagrees with me, but have trouble with a voter who is uninformed.

First of all, let me say that I am a fan of the Iowa Caucuses. I have been on both sides of the debate as to whether or not Iowa should get to be the powerful voice that it is in presidential elections, because I think there are legitimate arguments to be made for the “first in the nation” vote to rotate each time so that different states and different voters get to have the influence of that first vote. That aside, whether it is in Iowa or elsewhere, there is something powerful about the personal level of politics required to be successful in Iowa, and I happen to think that the caucus system is more effective for the initial vote than a primary would be, so I have no qualm with that. At the same time, I have to say that voter turnout for the Iowa caucuses tends to be relatively low, and–surprisingly, in my opinion–it was no higher this year than it was 4 years ago, despite the strong opinion among many that real change is needed in America.

Having attended undergraduate school in Des Moines, Iowa, I have some personal experience with the Iowa caucuses, too. To my absolute astonishment, there were precincts in and around Des Moines in 1996 who had no one to be in charge of the caucus meetings. As a result, a number of political science students from Drake University–including me–had the opportunity to get quite involved. I was not a resident of Iowa, so I could not vote, but I was in the position of checking voters registration, leading the caucus meeting, counting the votes and calling in the results. Pretty cool stuff! Even more surprising than the fact that there were some precincts with no one charge, there was one precinct meeting where no one showed up to vote. The precincts in that particular section of Des Moines were small enough, and ideal potential meeting locations rare enough, that two precincts were meeting in the same building. That turned out to be quite fortunate for me and the other student from Drake assigned to the building, since we were both able to be involved despite one having no one in attendance. But the bottom line is, whoever shows up gets one vote…and last night’s results clearly showed that one vote does make a difference, since Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum finished the night separated by only eight votes.

This was a surprise to many people, because Rick Santorum has consistently polled in the single digits, and he has been banished to the far end in every debate thus far. However, Santorum has campaigned consistently and persistently in Iowa, visiting every county in the state (and most of the Pizza Ranches, apparently) holding more than 300 meetings with voters. He does very well with local politics, and he has a clear and consistent message that many voters find appealing.

Still, there are plenty of people already saying Rick Santorum’s showing in yesterday’s Iowa caucuses will have little or no meaning on the rest of the campaign, presenting nothing more than slight bump in the road to Mitt Romney’s inevitable nomination. I have to disagree, and a deeper examination of the results of the Iowa vote reveals why: Quite simply, Santorum has broader support among the GOP candidates than anyone else.

Look at the numbers from the polls:

* Among men, Santorum and Romney each received 23% of the vote, just one percent behind Ron Paul’s 24%;

* Among women, Santorum and Romney each received 26% of the vote, 6% ahead of Ron Paul’s 20%;

* Among Republicans, Santorum received 28% of the vote, 1% more than Romney, and double the next closest candidates (Gingrich and Paul at 14% each);

* Among Conservatives, Santorum received 27% of the vote, 5% more than Romney and 9% more than Paul;

* Among young voters (17-29), Ron Paul was the runaway winner, with 48%, but Santorum was second at 23%, 10% more than Romney, the next-closest candidate;

* Among voters 30-44, Santorum was the winner with 29%, 1% more than Paul but 10% more than Romney;

* Among voters 45-64, Santorum was just 1% behind Romney (26% to 25%) and 8% ahead of Paul;

* Romney was the clear leader among voters 65+ with 32% of the vote, but Santorum was second with 19%, ahead of Gingrich (17%) and Perry (12%) and Paul (11%);

* Santorum was the clear winner among Evangelical voters, with 32% of the vote to Ron Paul’s 19%. Romney and Gingrich each had 14% and Perry 13%;

* Santorum finished third among non-evangelical voters, behind Romney (38%) and Paul (26%), and third among non-Tea Party voters behind Romney (44%) and Paul (21%);

* Santorum clearly won the Tea Party vote, with 28%. Romney and Paul each received 19%;

* Romney narrowly edged Santorum among college-educated voters (26% to 25%), but Santorum narrowly edged Romney among those without a college degree (23% to 22%).

Santorum’s only areas of huge weakness in Iowa were Independent voters, who went overwhelmingly with Ron Paul, and moderate voters, who gave a combined 74% of their vote to Paul and Romney. Among Independents, though, Santorum received 13% to Romney’s 18%. And Santorum did not finish lower than third in ANY category of voters. He finished third in four categories…but Romney finished third in three. Ron Paul’s lowest finish was fifth, among voters 65+.

So what can we take from this as we look ahead? First, Santorum is unlikely to perform as well in New Hampshire as he did in Iowa. New Hampshire is an area where Romney enjoys considerable support…support that will only be enhanced by John McCain endorsement of Romney there today. McCain has long been a New Hampshire favorite. However, along with Michele Bachmann announcing the end of her candidacy today and Rick Perry expected to do the same, McCain’s endorsement of Romney is actually likely to benefit Santorum. Many Republican voters, and particularly those who were drawn to Bachmann and Perry, voted against Barack Obama more than they voted for John McCain, and they tend to look at Mitt Romney the same way: he is better than Obama, but if there is another option they are likely to go that route. And right now, there are other options. Ron Paul will continue to generate his share of votes, because he appeals to a unique niche of voters and has a very unique message, but he will not be the Republican nominee, and will be unlikely to pick up much support from from the exit of Bachmann and Perry. New Hampshire is Jon Huntsman’s one chance at a decent showing, but it will end there for him. If he doesn’t finish second to Romney it will be a loss, and even if he does finish second, it won’t likely generate any additional success thereafter. Huntsman is the epitome of what many call a RINO, a Republican in Name Only, on many issues, and he simply isn’t going to find broad support. Gingrich has a chance to try to redeem himself in New Hampshire, but he seems more likely to devote his attention to defeating Romney than actually winning himself. And that, too, will only help Santorum.

Looking past New Hampshire, Santorum is likely to perform much better in South Carolina. There is a large number of voters in South Carolina among the constituencies in which Santorum scored well in Iowa, and if he can manage to pull off a finish in the top three in New Hampshire he will be in great shape heading south. Even a top-four finish is unlikely to hurt him.

This is crunch time for Santorum, though…especially at the two debates this weekend. Santorum will no longer be on the sidelines of the debate, and he will have to get more time and attention from the moderators. Gingrich isn’t going to attack him, and Ron Paul and Jon Huntsman will likely continue to direct their more aggressive attacks on Mitt Romney. (Paul already minimized Santorum in his speech to supporters last night, saying he does not have the funds for a national campaign). Santorum needs to stick to his message–repeating the themes of his speech last night–and stay true to his positions. He does have some things in his background that he will need to explain, most notably his past endorsement of Arlen Specter, but he is now primed to be the most likely candidate to emerge as an option to Mitt Romney for any GOP voters who aren’t considering Ron Paul’s candidacy a serious option.

As Santorum said last night, “Game on.”

Looking Back (Part 3)

In 2009 I was still working on UNTO THE LORD, as is reflected in my reading of the following titles: Patrick Lencioni’s The Five Dysfunctions of a Team, The Four Obsessions of an Extraordinary Executive, The Three Signs of a Miserable Job, and Death by Meeting, John Maxwell’s The 17 Essential Qualities of a Team Player, Jon Gordon’s The No Complaining Rule and Training Camp, Matt Williams’ How to Be a Team Player…and Enjoy It!, and Quint Studer’s Hardwiring Excellence. There are valuable insights in each of these books. I took much from Studer’s, proving, among other things, that leadership principles are transcendent, since Studer is a hospital executive. But if I had to recommend just one of these books it would definitely be Lencioni’s The Five Dysfunctions of a Team. Lencioni does not write from a biblical perspective, and I do not know that he is a believer, but the key points of this book are biblical, and the principles of the book are essential understanding for any effective team.

By way of spiritual growth and Christian living, Chuck Swindoll’s Improving Your Serve is a good book for an attitude check and the reminder that Christians are to lead by serving; Jack Eggar’s The Return of a Mighty Church provides a succinct examination of some of the things the modern church needs to remember in order to effectively reach the lost; Janet Paschal’s Treasures of the Snow is a personal and poignant look at the strength and comfort that God can provide during a time of very personal struggle–in this case breast cancer; Ravi Zacharias edited an excellent book of thought-provoking essays entitled Beyond Opinion; Jonathan Falwell’s One Great Truth is a satisfactory examination of the practical implications of Paul’s statement “Not I, but Christ;” Joe Stowell’s Perilous Pursuits is a good reminder to pursue those things that really matter…not the temporary things that the world says are important; Erwin Lutzer’s The Vanishing Power of Death is a short but powerful examination of why death is not scary for the Christian (my grandmother gave me this book, and it had special meaning to me when she went home to be with the Lord the following year); and Max Lucado’s Just Like Jesus is a poignant but easy-to-read in Lucado style tome. The most convicting book I read though, and one I highly recommend, was Jerry Bridges’ Respectable Sins.

I read a variety of history in 2009, too, including Gordon Wood’s Revolutionary Characters, which looks at some of the more influential characters of the American Revolutionary War era; Freeman Cleeves’ biography of our ninth president, Old Tippecanoe; Joseph Ellis’ American Creation and Bernard Bailyn’s To Begin the World Anew, both about the founding era; Buddy Levy’s biography of Davy Crockett, American Legend; and, fast forwarding to World War II, Jennet Connant’s The Irregulars, a look at the British spy ring in Washington, D.C. that included Roald Dahl and Ian Fleming.

For more contemporary political history I also read Valerie Plame’s autobiographical Fair Game; Barack Obama’s The Audacity of Hope; Mike Huckabee’s Do the Right Thing; Lorenzo Benet’s biography of Sarah Palin, Trailblazer; and Palin’s autobiography, Going Rogue.

Fiction selections included these contemporary offerings: Jeffrey Archer’s False Impression; David Baldacci’s Divine Justice, Simple Genius, The Collectors and First Family; John Grisham’s The Associate and Ford County; James Patterson’s Cross, Double Cross, Run For Your Life and Step on a Crack; Brad Meltzer’s The Tenth Justice; and Alison Hoover Bartlett’s The Man Who Loved Books Too Much. Classic fiction included Washington Irving’s The Legend of Sleepy Hollow and Other Stories; William Faulkner’s The Sound and the Fury; Arthur Conan Doyle’s The Return of Sherlock Holmes; and F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby. I also read William Young’s The Shack in 2009, and I have to say I am still undecided as to whether I liked it or not. I agree with some of the points Young made, consider others with skepticism at best or disagreement at worst. However, a comprehensive review of the book is not called for here.

Two books that I read in 2009 that were hard to read because of their subject matter were Gary Haugen’s Just Courage and David Batstone’s Not for Sale. Batstone’s is particularly hard to read. The subject matter of these books is the slavery of people around the world, often overlooked or ignored, that is in reality still incredibly–and disturbingly–prevalent. The content of the books is disturbing but necessary, and I am thrilled that the books have prompted some individuals and groups to take definite action in combating forced labor and sexual slavery.

Elizabeth Edwards’ Resilience is a short but profound and thought-provoking book. I did not agree with Edwards on many political issues, but the way in which she handled herself in light of her own breast cancer and her husband’s infidelity is admirable. Marlee Matlin’s I’ll Scream Later is at times disturbing, at times disappointing, but overall a unique look at the life of America’s most successful deaf actress. And Jodee Blanco’s Please Stop Laughing at Me is a book far too many young people today could identify with, and provides excellent evidence of the kind of bullying that until recently received far too little attention.

And, lest you think I skipped any sports books in 2009, I did read Dave Winfield’s Dropping the Ball.

I hope I’m not boring you, but like I said, this is more personal reflection than anything else, and I am enjoying this look back at my reading habits. It is fun to see what I was reading and when, and to remember the details of the various books. Sometimes I can even remember where I was or specific things that were going on when I read some of them, or conversations that I had with certain people about some of the books while I was reading them. Fortunately, I have not yet come across a title and found myself thinking, “I don’t remember that book at all… Did I really read that?”

Two more years to go….

Looking Back (part 2)

Moving on to 2008… In July of 2008 I experienced an issue with my health that would put my mostly out of commission for several weeks, and resulted in me going for nearly a month without completing a book as I literally did very little of anything. (Thank goodness the first season of Matlock had just come out on DVD; I watched lots of Matlock during those weeks!) Still, I managed to finish the year having completed exactly 50 books.

There are, again, a number of books that reflect my work with young people, including Kevin Lehman’s Have a New Kid by Friday, and two that reflect my interest at the time in exploring the messages our culture sends to young people through media: Alissa Quart’s Branded and S. Lamb and L.M. Brown’s Packaging Girlhood.

A large number of the books I read in 2008 though were related to my study of what it means to be a Christian in the workplace–to reflect Christ in day to day activities at work regardless of position. This study ultimately led to the development of UNTO THE LORD: The Roles and Responsibilities of the Christian Worker. Thus far it is only a multi-session training curriculum that has received very positive reviews from those who have participated, but I hope it will someday be a book, too. But the books I read in my study included John Marchica’s The Accountable Organization, Bruce Katcher’s 30 Reasons Employees Hate Their Managers, R.T. Kendall’s Controlling the Tongue, John Trent’s The 2 Degree Difference, Chip Ingram’s Good to Great in God’s Eyes, Beth Moore’s When Godly People Do Ungodly Things, John Townsend’s Whose Pushing Your Buttons?, John Maxwell’s The 360° Leader, Dan Allender’s Leading With a Limp, Ken Sande’s The Peace Maker, Lou Priolo’s Pleasing People, and John Ortberg’s Everybody’s Normal Till You Get to Know Them. There are valuable lessons and insights in each of these books and I would likely recommend any one of them at one time or another to different people and in different situations. If I had to select just one to recommend from this list, though, Allender’s book is a great exploration of what true leadership is…and isn’t, and that would be the standout of the bunch.

I also read Marcus Buckingham’s trilogy of books on identifying and implementing strengths in the workplace, First, Break All the Rules (with C. Coffman), Now, Discover Your Strengths (with D. Clifton) and Go Put Your Strengths to Work. All three were valuable, and include lessons applicable outside of the workplace, as well–to Christian ministry, for example, even volunteer ministry positions within the church.

Spiritual development and Christian living books in 2008 included Shaunti and Jeff Feldhahn’s For Men Only (an excellent book for men wanting a better understanding of their wives in general and how a woman’s mind works differently than a man’s in particular), Surrender by Nancy Leigh DeMoss (a small but powerful book), The Holy Wild by Mark Buchanan (who has become a favorite contemporary Christian writer and an excellent expositor of thought-provoking reflections on applying Scripture), Desiring God by John Piper (if you are familiar with John Piper at all you have likely at least heard of this book; and if you want to understand the concept of “Christian hedonism” on which the majority of Piper’s ministry has been based this is a must-read), God is Good by Tony Beckett (another easy to read book with very relevant insights) and The Grand Weaver by Ravi Zacharias (in my mind, you cannot go wrong with anything written by Zacharias). I also read Buchanan’s Hidden in Plain Sight, a powerful examination of 2 Peter 2:1-9 in which Buchanan identifies and explores the virtues that should be evident in the Christian life. I end with this book for this section because it is the one I would recommend, if I had to pick just one, from the books mentioned in this paragraph.

There was some fiction in 2008, too, including the classic children’s favorite Stuart Little by E.B. White, the Christian classic Pilgrim’s Progress by John Bunyan, and Edith Wharton’s The Age of Innocence, the 1921 Pulitzer Prize winner for Literature. More contemporary fiction offerings included David Baldacci’s The Camel Club, the introduction to his recurring set of characters by the same name, and John Grisham’s The Appeal. In fact, I read a good bit of both Baldacci and Grisham in 2008, with Baldacci’s Stone Cold and The Whole Truth and Grisham’s Bleachers and Playing for Pizza rounding out the list. Baldacci’s books would be great for anyone who enjoys conspiracy theories, in particular. Bleachers is Grisham’s short book about adult males returning to their hometown after the death of their high school football coach, and Playing for Pizza is a look at an NFL quarterback whose career is in the dumps who decides to head for Italy to play in a new Italian football league. Were this book made into a movie, and the pre-marital sexual activity left out (though it is not portrayed graphically in the book) it would be an almost-perfect combination of sports movie and chick-flick. I also read Randy Alcorn’s Safely Home. While this is a work of fiction, it is a powerful book examining the persecution of Christians in China.

As for 2008’s non-fiction selections, I read James Swanson’s Manhunt, an outstanding book on the weeks following the assassination of Abraham Lincoln, the escape route of John Wilkes Booth, and the ensuing hunt to find Booth and his accomplices. The book was particularly meaningful for me since I grew up in Southern Maryland right where many of the events take place, but I highly recommend the book to anyone interested in that era of American history. Angus Konstam’s Blackbeard is an admirable biography of that most-famous of American pirates for anyone interested in that sliver of history. Kenneth Walsh’s Feeding the Beast is a decent look at the way media, particularly in this age of 24/7 news, relates to politics, and Donald Cole’s Martin Van Buren and the American Political System is a good biography of the Little Magician from Kinderhook. Bernard Ruffin’s Fanny Crosby is an excellent biography of the prolific hymn writer, and Tony Dungy’s Quiet Strength is a good book for anyone, whether football fan or not.

Tomorrow I’ll provide an overview of the 64 books I read in 2009….

Looking Back (part 1)

As one year ends and another is about to begin it is a time that naturally lends itself to looking back…reflecting on the past. Usually that reflection involves looking back at the previous year, and I could certainly go on for quite some time in reflecting on the past twelve months because it has been a 12 months unlike any other 12 month period in my life. And I just may do that over the next few days. Today, though, I want to reflect back over the past five years, because the end of 2011 marks the end of five years since I decided to start keeping a record of the books I read.

I have enjoyed reading for as long as I can remember, and I have always read a lot. In January 2007, though, I decided to start recording the titles of each book I read and the date on which I finished the book. I think partly it was out of curiosity. Partly it was a challenge to myself–I wanted to see how many books I read, since I really had no idea, and I arbitrarily picked a goal of 50 books for the year. It may have had something to do with the fact that I turned 30 in 2007, too, though I cannot now think of any specific correlation between turning 30 and wanting to record my reading habits. Whatever the reason(s), I did begin such a record, and I have been keeping track ever since. And now, five years into it, it seems like a good time to look back at what I have read…to see what it tells me about me, if nothing else.

First of all, I did meet my goal of 50 books in 2007. Exceeded it, in fact. And I have met or exceeded that goal in each of the five years, reading a total of 311 books over that span. (Not counting all the books I have read to my children during that time!) The smallest figure over those five years was 50, in 2008…and I finished the 50th book on December 31! The largest number was 78 (this year). This may impress some of you, especially if you don’t read much. To average more than one completed book per week over five years probably seems remarkable. To others, it may seem but a modest accomplishment, as you may read far more than that. It seemed rather insignificant when I read in George W. Bush’s book Decision Points (finished that one in January 2011) that he read more than 100 books per year. After all, I’d like to think I have more time to read than the President of the United States does!

It has been said that you can identify a person’s priorities by looking at two things: their checkbook and their calendar. I agree. I would also suggest, however, that you can learn a lot about someone by looking at the books they read. So, I’m about to do some self-examination…and I guess you get to look on while I do.

Let’s start with 2007. I was still the Executive Director of a children’s home then, and that is reflected somewhat by my reading for the year in books like David Popenoe’s Life Without Father, and Lawrence Diller’s The Last Normal Child, John Townsend’s Boundaries with Teens, and Koren Zailckas’s Smashed. Popenoe leaves the reader with no doubt that children are adversely impacted by a life without a father, despite the argument many have tried to make to the contrary. Diller talks about the dangerous overuse of prescription drugs on children in America in a book of essays that continue where his previous book, Running on Ritalin, left off. Townsend, of the well-known pair of John Townsend and Henry Cloud, takes a look at the application of the “Boundaries” philosophy for which the pair is so well known as it applies to teenagers. And Zailckas provides a disturbingly graphic and simultaneously heart wrenching account of being a teenage alcoholic…and her parents never having a clue.

2007 also includes a good number of books on personal spiritual growth and Christian living, including Henry & David Blackaby’s Called to Be God’s Leader, Max Lucado’s Facing Your Giants, John MacArthur’s Lord, Teach Me to Pray, Adrian Rogers’ The Incredible Power of Kingdom Authority, David Jeremiah’s Captured by Grace, John Ortberg’s When the Game is Over, It All Goes Back in the Box, Chip Ingram’s God As He Longs for You to See Him, Mark Buchanan’s Your God is Too Safe and James MacDonald’s Lord Change My Attitude. I think most folks would benefit from reading any of these books, but if you have to pick just one, MacDonald’s book is convicting, relevant, and applicable to any person, anywhere, in any stage of life. I strongly recommend it.

My interest in politics and baseball is also reflected in 2007’s reading. Sean Hannity’s Deliver Us From Evil, Newt Gingrich’s To Renew America, J.C. Watts’ What Color is a Conservative, Major Garrett and Tim Penny’s The Fifteen Biggest Lies in Politics, David Frum’s Dead Right, Tommy Thompson’s Power to the People, and Katherine Harris’s Center of the Storm are all there. I don’t recollect any of these being bad books, but Hannity’s is what you would expect from a right wing radio/TV host. If you like Hannity, Limbaugh, Colter, etc. you’ll enjoy it. If not, don’t bother. Gingrich’s book should be read by anyone considering voting for him in the current election. Watts’ book was very well written, and Thompson’s provides a nice overview of his tenure as governor of Wisconsin. Garrett and Penny have a nice and relevant book, but it was not as good as their first book, Common Cents. For baseball, Joe Morgan’s Long Balls, No Strikes is a good book for any baseball fan. Cal Ripken, Jr.’s Get in the Game is an application of principles he has learned to the game of life, and Ricky Henderson’s Off Base is what you would expect from a very talented, but also very arrogant, baseball star.

There was a smattering of fiction in 2007, as in later years, both contemporary and “classic.” Michael Crichton’s State of Fear was a very interesting read, and would undoubtedly tick off any die hard environmentalists or climate change supporters, too. I read Beowulf, and didn’t like it. I know many do, and I am sure it has literary value, but it wasn’t my cup of tea. Arthur Conan Doyle’s The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes is much more my style, and I enjoyed the first volume of Holmes and Watson very much. Daniel Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe is also excellent, and absolutely should be on any list of best books.

Other nonfiction… John Grisham’s one and, thus far, only non-fiction contribution, Innocent Man, is well written and an incredible story. David Halberstam’s The Education of a Coach is a good and even interesting book…but I still can’t stand Bill Belichick! Many Ways to Say I Love You is a nice compilation of some of the songs and thoughts of Fred Rogers. Mrs. J.H. Worchester’s brief biography, David Livingstone and Dr. and Mrs. Howard Taylor’s The Spiritual Secret of Hudson Taylor are both good books about those incredible men. John Gray’s Custer’s Last Campaign is a thorough examination of it’s title subject. A good book for those interested in Custer or The Battle of the Little Bighorn, but it would likely exhaust or put to sleep those who are at best mildly interested. Robert Remini’s The Life of Andrew Jackson, though, is a relatively easy read and I would recommend it for anyone wanting to know more about the life of our seventh president.

Well…when I started this I actually intended to look back over the last five years in one entry, but it seems that would be a bit much. Just a brief overview of 2007 has resulted in one of my longest entries yet, and I did not even mention twenty-one of the books I read that year. I’ll knock that down to twenty though by stating that Phil Vischer’s Me, Myself and Bob is a fantastic book. I am not a huge fan of VeggieTales, but this book is an excellent look at the cost of pursuing a dream, the cost of turning too much of your dream over to others once success is achieved, and, ultimately, the cost of seeing that dream ended when your dream and God’s plan are no longer in sync. I recommend it highly to anyone.

Anyway, I guess I’ll have to reflect on 2008-2011 over the next few days…so stay tuned.

Sighting in a Rifle…and a Life

A few days ago I went up on Battle Mountain with my father-in-law and brother-in-law so that my brother-in-law could sight in his new rifle. My father-in-law stepped off the distance and set up several clay targets. Meanwhile, my brother-in-law carefully set up his bench rest on a downed tree trunk, set a couple of small sand bags on top of the rest, and did everything necessary to get himself properly situated to get a steady shooting position. He would take a couple of shots, and then, based on the observations of my father-in-law, he would adjust the scope settings up or down, left or right in order to get the scope sighted as accurately as possible.

As I was watching and thinking about this process I realized how similar it is the process for sighting in life, too. We have to read the Bible in order to know how we ought to live. Similarly, someone (I assume) should read the owner’s manual for a new rifle and/or scope in order to understand the manufacturer’s specifications and the proper operation of the equipment. However, simply reading the Bible is not enough, just as reading the owner’s manual in and of itself would be of little value. Only by living out the instructions in God’s Word does the Bible have any meaningful impact, just as only by shooting the rifle will it be of any value. However, living out our lives–or shooting a rifle–is still not enough, because quite frankly it is highly unlikely that we will get it right the first time (in life or with the rifle).

As I mentioned, after a couple of shots there would be an evaluation of how close the shots were coming to the selected target, and then adjustments would be made accordingly. Similarly, we need to regularly evaluate our lives by pausing to see how close we are coming to the target of living in accordance with God’s instructions. When we see that are missing the mark, we need to make adjustments in order to bring our lives closer to the bullseye. We may remember from reading Scripture before what we need to do, or we may need to go back to our “owner’s manual” and remind ourselves how the Designer intends us to live. Then, we take another shot or two before we stop and evaluate again. With persistence and careful calibration we should be able to bring the rifle or the scope to the point that we can hit exactly what we aim at. Likewise, we should eventually get to the point where we live in a manner that allows us consistently hit the mark of living a godly life.

With a rifle, it is fairly obvious whether or not the target is hit. It takes closer inspection sometimes to see how far off the shot was, or in which direction, but even the casual observer can usually see whether or not the marksman hit his target. It is not always quite so obvious in life, though the more attuned we are to God’s Word the easier it should be for us to readily see how close we are to the target. Even a marksman that hits his target dead one with one shot, though, will sometimes miss the next time. When that happens, it is time to reevaluate. In life, we may handle a situation exactly the way God would want us to, and then blow it the next time. That means we need to reevaluate our lives, too. It may be that the scope needs to be re-sighted in order for it to remain accurate. Similarly, we may need to make some adjustments by checking our understanding and studying anew how we are to behave and speak and live out our salvation. Sometimes, though, the scope is still sighted accurately but the marksman shifted as he shot, or closed his eye, or got distracted, or…whatever. Somehow, the one pulling the trigger caused the shot to miss the mark even though the scope was sighted perfectly. Truth is, this is most often what will be the case in our lives. Assuming we understand the Scripture accurately and know how to apply it to our lives, our “scope” will not be the problem. The problem will be us–the flawed and fallible humans “pulling the trigger.” The circumstances of life, whatever they may be, can cause us to miss the mark…even when there is absolutely nothing wrong with our sights. Just like the responsible and effective marksman we must acknowledge our error and do everything we can to eliminate the possibility of that same disruption occurring again.

The marksman may use a stand, a shooting block, sandbags, or any number of other devices in order to help keep his rifle steady as he shoots. Some will be quite effective standing up, shouldering the rifle and taking the shot with no aides. Neither is right or wrong…success is measured only by whether or not the target is hit. In the same way, there may be times when we need to utilize aides to help us stay steady in our Christian walk. These aides may include Christian friends, accountability partners, regular attendance and participation in church, daily Bible reading and time in prayer, Christian music, Christian books, sermons on radio/CD/MP3…and so on. The point is, the aides that I find helpful and necessary in order to keep my life steady and on target may not look exactly the same as yours…but neither of us is right in what we choose to utilize. And, what I need in some situations may be very different from what I need in others; what I need one week may not be what I need the next.

What we do all need, however, is a submissive attitude to the leading and guiding of the Holy Spirit in our lives. The Spirit will inform us–quietly, usually, but accurately–whether or not we missed the target, by how much and in what direction. Then He will tell us what adjustments need to be made, so that we can hit the target the next time.

Memories of Grandpa

Today, in just a couple of hours, there will be a service to celebrate the life of my maternal grandfather, who went home to be with the Lord early Monday morning. Anytime a loved one passes away it is normal to reflect on favorite memories.

When I reflect on my favorite memories of Grandpa there are quite a few. I can remember as a very young boy going with Grandma and Grandpa to the mountain property that they had, where the only housing was a tent. I remember the trips up and back more than the actual time there, playing in the back seat and on the floor of the blue truck–when the wearing of seat belts wasn’t enforced. Many of my fondest memories with Grandpa took place in West Virginia, at Holly River State Park. Our annual week-long trips to Holly River are among the highlights of my childhood, and Holly River remains one of my “happy places.” More than any specific thing Grandpa did on those trips, I remember the freedom my brother Phillip and I were given to explore on our own. Though probably not literally, it felt to young boys like we had free reign of the entire park! Playing in the creek, swimming in the always-too-cold pool and playing softball; feeding the trout, going on hayrides, and walking to the commissary. I do remember the hikes we would take with Grandma and Grandpa, and I remember Grandpa would always turn the flashlight off on the way back from late-night activities at the pavilion and it would be pitch black along the road. Before long, the flashlight would come on again, from under Grandpa’s face, shining up to illuminate his smile.

Grandpa’s long hours building the “cabin” in the backyard of the home we lived in from the time I was 5 until I was 13 cannot be forgotten. I think that will likely go down in history as the most soundly-built “playhouse” any children ever had! And who can forget Grandpa giving Dr. Pepper to our German shepherd, Sampson? By the way, every time I drink soda from a bottle—glass or plastic—I have to blow across the top of the bottle and get a few “toots” just for Grandpa. I suspect I will do that for the rest of my life.

I think more than anything else I loved to listen to Grandpa tell stories. It seemed this happened most often at the table, after a meal or during “treat,” (late-night dessert, which almost always included ice cream!) and I could listen to Grandpa’s stories as long as he wanted to tell them. Most of the stories were of his own escapades, but he seemed to tell stories of his friend Kramer with just as much enthusiasm. I think if I had one wish it would be that we had recorded Grandpa telling some of his best stories. He always got so tickled with the stories himself you couldn’t help but laugh along with him. I imagine none of us will ever forget many of his tales, and I suspect many of them will live on for at least another generation or two, as my generation recalls these stories with one another and with our children.

Interestingly, I still remember the time when we were visiting Grandma and Grandpa when I was in college, and realizing that Grandpa now talked to me like an adult. That was a special feeling. I was not blessed with Grandpa’s gifts of mathematical and scientific knowledge or hands-on talent; I think Phillip got those genes. But it always fascinated me that Grandpa had worked on the Pioneer Venus satellite, and it amazed me to watch how he would figure things out and design systems probably few other people would understand. I also remember sitting on the floor by the kitchen telephone in Minnesota when I was in high school, listening to Grandpa trying to explain my Algebra homework to me from half a country away.

I think there was only one time I had the opportunity to be in Grandpa’s Sunday school class, but it was a pleasure to see the painstaking detail that went into his many charts, and to hear the understanding that he had of Scripture. His example of consistently reading through the Bible each year is something for which I am also grateful.

As I write this, trying to think of what to share, I find my mind filled with lots of memories…far too many to share. I know all of Grandpa’s grandchildren loved him very much, and we all know he loved us, too. We are all blessed with many happy memories of Grandpa…memories we will never forget.

I do not recall having very many conversations with Grandpa on the telephone, but I do remember my last one, shortly after he returned home from the hospital this past fall. We talked briefly about him and how he was feeling, but then he wanted to know about our new home, my new job, and the terrain of South Dakota. It was clear that he was at peace with whatever the Lord’s will was for his health and life. I will miss Grandpa, and I wish I could have seen him again before he went home, but I am grateful for the knowledge that he is in heaven, completely healthy. I know I will see him again someday. I remember that every time Grandpa prayed, he would always say, “And thank you most of all for the Lord Jesus our Savior.” This Christmas, he is in the presence of our Savior, thanking Him face to face.

Lessons from the Shepherds (part 3)

The third thing to notice about the shepherds is that they Announced Comprehensively. Not only did they hear the message, but once they heard it they acted on it. Then, after they had acted on it and seen Jesus for themselves, they announced it. Verse 17 says that, “[W]hen they had seen Him, they made widely known the saying which was told them concerning this Child” (NKJV). The Message paraphrases this verse this way: “They told everyone they met what the angels had said about this child.”

The shepherds knew the truth about Christmas, and they went out to share it with everyone they saw. I can imagine them running through the streets of Bethlehem, shouting, grabbing people by the hands and telling them the wonderful news. How many of us have taken the time to share with someone this season–even just one person–that Jesus is what Christmas is all about?

When I was growing up my family had a tradition. We would get up and open presents at home on Christmas morning–my parents, my brother and me. (This is before my sisters were born). Then, we would drive eight minutes away to my paternal grandmother’s house. There we would eat brunch (which always included what we called “egg bake casserole”) and open presents with Grandma. After we had been there for a while we would drive 40 minutes to my maternal grandparents’ house, and there we would spend the rest of the day–opening presents, eating dinner, and so forth. But when I got to Grandma’s house in the morning I couldn’t wait to tell her what presents I had received from Mom and Dad. And when I got to Grandma and Grandpa’s house later I couldn’t wait to tell them what I got from Mom and Dad and from Grandma. Then, a day or two later, when I saw my friends, I would tell them everything I got for Christmas from Mom and Dad, Grandma, and Grandma and Grandpa! I had received these presents, and I wanted everyone to know about these great gifts.

Every believer has a wonderful gift from God–the gift of eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord. And yet for some reason, most of us don’t seem too excited to tell anyone about that gift. We’ll tell people–even as adults, many times–about our new clothes or our new car or our new “toys,” but we won’t tell them about our new life in Christ…and the fact that they can have that gift, too!

The other thing that I think is worth noting about the shepherds announcing Christ’s birth is that there is no indication in the biblical account that anyone paid any attention to what they said. The only thing Luke tells us is in verse 18: “Everyone was surprised when they heard what the shepherds told them” (ESV). That’s it! They could have been surprised as in they were in awe of the birth of the Messiah, or they could have been surprised as in they thought the shepherds were crazy. Either way there is no indication that anyone else went to see the Baby for themselves. No where do we read that the stable was suddenly overwhelmed by crowds of people wanting to see Jesus for themselves. And remember, it’s not like there was no one in town! The whole reason Mary, Joseph and Jesus were in the stable in the first place is because all the inns were full!

Yet, and this is my imagination again, I suppose, I do not picture the shepherds being slowed down at all by whatever reaction they received from the people they told. Whether people smiled and nodded, said something like “Wow, that’s cool!” or told them to shut up and go away, I suspect the shepherds were still overcome with joy and still told everyone else they saw. Let that be a lesson to us, too–regardless of the reaction we may receive when we share the Good News, we need to keep spreading the Word!

Like the shepherds, we need to attend to God’s message, act on it, and announce His gift. John MacArthur calls the shepherds the “first New Testament evangelists.” “The shepherds’ story is a good illustration of the Christian life,” he writes. “You first hear the revelation of the gospel and believe it. Then you pursue and embrace Christ. And having become a witness to your glorious conversion, you begin to tell others about it. May God grant you the life-changing spiritual experiences and the ongoing attitude of enthusiasm and responsiveness that cause you to tell others that you, too, have seen Christ the Lord.”

It is easy to get caught up with the activities of Christmas time. There’s a lot going on. There is plenty of good, fun things to do. But if we forget or neglect what Christmas is all about then we will have ruined it. If we forget Christ, then we miss the point entirely. May we be like the shepherds and share the truth of Christmas, the truth of God’s Christmas present to the world, with everyone we meet.

Lessons from the Shepherds (part 2)

The second important lesson that we can learn from the shepherds is that they Acted Quickly. (If you’re a note taker, you’ll recognize immediately that “quickly” starts with a “q” not a “c,” but it works phonetically). The shepherds not only had the message, but they obeyed the message. Verse 16 tells us that “they came with haste.” That means they were in a hurry. They did not look at each other and say, “Maybe we should go check that out tomorrow.” No, they heard, they got up, and they went. And as far as we know–as far as the Scriptural account indicates–the shepherds were the only people who went to see the Savior that night.

The shepherds were the first to hear the good news that the Messiah had been born, and certainly having the news announced in person by a heavenly host of angels would have been an awesome experience. However, we too have the message of the angels. We know the good news that the Messiah was born…and we have the rest of the story, too. We know that He lived a perfect, sinless life, that He died on the cross, that He rose again three days later, and later ascended into heaven where He sits today at the right hand of God the Father.

I am guilty, though, of not always acting quickly in response to the message of Christmas. I am careful to remember the real meaning of Christmas and to be sure that it remains at the center of our family celebration, but I do not always remember, or take time, to share that true message with others. Having the good news is wonderful, and remembering the true meaning of Christmas is imperative. But in and of itself that is not enough. We must not keep that message to ourselves…as we will see tomorrow in the final lesson from the shepherds.

Lessons from the Shepherds (part 1)

Now that we have concluded our examination of the Dangerous Distractions that can prevent us from focusing on the Design of our Deliverance, I would like to look at three important lessons that we can learn from the shepherds. The shepherds who were tending their flocks in the fields outside of Bethlehem on that first Christmas night were the first individuals to ever recognize the Design of their Deliverance and the first to celebrate the true meaning of Christmas.

Luke 2:15 reads, “When the angels went away from them into heaven, the shepherds said to one another, ‘Let us go over to Bethlehem and see this thing that has happened, which the Lord has made known to us.'”

The first thing we see about the shepherds is that they Attended Carefully. The word “attended” here means that they listened. The shepherds listened to what the angels had to say. They recognized that it was a messenger of the Lord who was speaking to them, and they listened carefully. There are far too few people today listening carefully to the message of Christmas. They think that the message is all about glad tidings and giving presents and Santa Claus and snow and fruitcake. And those things are all good and fun. (Except maybe fruitcake). But those things are not what Christmas is about. People who focus on these things miss the real meaning–they miss the true gift–because they do not attend carefully to the message of the manger.

With the hustle and bustle of the Christmas season it can be very easy to let the meaning of Christmas get drowned out by all of the noise and distraction around us. Even when we do pause to read or listen to the Christmas story from the Bible, we may even be tempted to let it go in one ear and out the other. After all, for many of us it is a story that is very familiar, and it can easily become just something else on our Christmas “to do” list. This year, let me encourage you to slow down, eliminate all distractions, and give your full attention to the wonderful message of the Christmas story. I am sure that if you will attend carefully to the message you will be blessed and encouraged by the reminder of the real Reason for this season.